RainCoat Man asked:
If you want intelligent design and creationism taught in schools, why not just make your own private schools or home school your kids? Why do you feel you have to impose your religious will on the rest of American school children and the scientific community?
Scientific method refers to bodies of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[1] A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation and experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses.[2]
Although procedures vary from one field of inquiry to another, identifiable features distinguish scientific inquiry from other methodologies of knowledge. Scientific researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of phenomena, and design experimental studies to test these hypotheses. These steps must be repeatable in order to dependably predict any future results. Theories that encompass wider domains of inquiry may bind many hypotheses together in a coherent structure. This in turn may help form new hypotheses or place groups of hypotheses into context.
Among other facets shared by the various fields of inquiry is the conviction that the process be objective to reduce a biased interpretation of the results. Another basic expectation is to document, archive and share all data and methodology so they are available for careful scrutiny by other scientists, thereby allowing other researchers the opportunity to verify results by attempting to reproduce them. This practice, called full disclosure, also allows statistical measures of the reliability of these data to be established.
Campbelt- Climatology was not a discipline or a major study in the academic world until about 25 years ago. Prior to that you are correct it was offered under the meteorology programs at universities. But as a norm, it was not a recognized discipline where scientists studied only climate. Paleoclimatology and courses such as this were probably offered also under the guise of other majors. Only in the last 10-15 years have most universities added degrees in the subject, however the science is very young compared to the other physical sciences.
And to the other guy below, yes I am a scientist and have testified before congress on a specific chemical compound and its epidemiology to Man. I have debated many political science majors who call themselves scientists and who know nothing about the process. Lawyers are another bunch who irritate me. I am also a forester with many years experience around the world, ie academic and hands on experience. So there.
Antarcticaice comments: You see, this guy doesn’t know yet makes a comment about me that he knows nothing about just as he does on the issue of AGW. This is how they fight their battles and spew junk science to the masses.
